Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Ethics - A Commitment to Community



As a business student at the Daniels College of Business, I have come to realize that ethical responsibility is a popular topic at the University of Denver. Ethics is emphasized in every class and lecture. It is referenced in Chancellor Comb's Vision and Mission Statement, and it is listed in “The Daniels Core Values." Through my studies, I have been taught to consider ethical responsibility in every situation.

Ethics. According to the Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary, ethics is “a system of moral values” and “the consciousness of moral importance.” Although morality is open to interpretation and personal opinion, it has one underlying intrinsic characteristic – consideration. Morality considers the wellbeing of others in every choice and action. Therefore, ethics is simply the application of morality, contemplating what is best for others and considering others in every choice.

Today, ethics is a major consideration in business. In the days of the Industrial Revolution, profit was king and every decision was based entirely on the bottom line, but that set of values has become largely outdated. No longer are sweatshops and child labor acceptable. Employers are prevented from taking advantage of employees and are required to provide safe work environments. Sick days and optional benefits are commonplace. Although profit is still the main focus of any modern business, most contemporary business plans aim to maximize profits without encroaching upon or harming others. Companies have realized that being socially aware and cognizant of environmental effects – ethics – can in fact increase their profits, allowing them to capitalize on changing markets. For example, in 2009, the United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recognized TOMS Shoes with the Award for Corporation Excellence for their “commitment to corporate social responsibility, innovation, exemplary practices, and democratic values worldwide.” At the University of Denver, the Daniels College of Business has embraced this popular movement toward ethics, incorporating a “commitment to community” and “ethical behavior toward all constituencies” into all curriculums. Methods for increasing profit are taught right along side responsibility to the community. Doing the right thing has become just as important as making the most money.

Unfortunately, I have observed an inconsistency on campus; not all of the University of Denver campus has embraced this pledge to ethics. One department specifically, Parking and Transportation Services, continues to focus on individual gains and chooses to ignore the needs of the greater community. My first complaint with the business practices of Parking revolves around the General Parking Permit. For students with cars on campus, they are given an option to purchase a general permit, allowing them to park in any of the select general parking lots on campus. It is the cheapest permit offered by Parking and Transportation, and consequently, it does not guarantee a parking space. Given this stipulation, I have little sympathy for students complaining about not finding a parking spot near Olin at 7:55am. It is not Parking and Transportation’s fault that there are no available spots left in a popular lot right before classes start for the day. I do not have a problem with the more expensive permits being allowed to park in general lots. Customers of more expensive permits pay for one space and get one space; Parking only gets paid once for one parking space. I do, however, condemn Parking’s unlimited sale of general permits. By selling more permits than spaces available, they deliberately sell a product they may not have. From my perspective as a first year business student, there is no difference between Parking and Transportation and a store selling items they do not have and collecting profits despite the fact that no product was delivered. In essence, they are selling one item repeatedly, and collecting money multiple times for that one item. They maximize profits by ignoring their customers and the impact on the surrounding community. They maximize profits by ignoring business ethics. Yes, Parking has a monopoly on parking around campus and therefore can set high prices to match high demand, but that does not give them the right to completely disregard moral and social responsibility by any means.

My second problem with Parking and Transportation services stems from event parking on campus. This issue plagues every parking customer, from the general parking permits to the most expensive and exclusive parking permits. During special events, Parking opens up their lots to visitors to campus, charging a fee to park in campus parking spaces. Again, like selling more general parking permits than there are spots available, Parking and Transportation charges visitors to park in spots already paid for by parking permits. Again, they collect money multiple times for each parking space to maximize profit with complete disregard to ethics. Again, they maximize profits by ignoring business ethics.

Parking and Transportation Services is guilty of devoting themselves entirely to profitability while rejecting their responsibility to the community. I would like to clarify, I do not have a car on campus and therefore I do not need a parking permit through Parking and Transportation Services. I do not have any personal vendetta against parking or any other investment in the parking situation. I do, however, believe in responsible profit, and as a DU student, I am flabbergasted that Parking and Transportation has deliberately rejected moral responsibility in its business practices, especially when ethics is a core value of other departments at the university.

There is a problem with parking on the University of Denver campus, and to borrow from the university’s advertisement campaign, we need to DU Something about it. By no means am I arguing that Parking and Transportation Services become a non-profit organization, but I do believe that they need to adopt the values of other departments on campus, and practice the concepts taught in the classroom. They need demonstrate that profitability can be coupled with ethical responsibility. Not only is it the right thing to do, but Parking and Transportation Services needs to set an example for students.


3 comments:

  1. I really enjoyed reading this post and I think that this blog should be sent to the parking and transportation department of DU. This was very well presented and offered many good facts. I really liked how you call Parking out on their contradictory methods and how greedy they are. I especially liked the example about receiving multiple profits for the same product. It seems like stealing in a way and it makes me quite angry. I don't have any respect for the parking and transportation department. This blog was definitely persuasive and appealed to my pathos in a strong way. I strongly believe that DU needs to DU something about this problem. Very well written. Definitely made me want to take action to change things.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am a DCB student and agree with the whole ethics statement but I found it to be a bit lengthy and uncertain as to where it was taking me at first. However, I did enjoy reading your post and could totally relate to it because I have many friends who have been victims the money-craving parking department. Besides your first paragraph, I think that your argument is well presented and strongly backed up with many facts. I was really touched by this and I feel like i should try and DU something about this issue because it is simply unfair. I especially love how you point out that the Department of Transportation is part of the school and operate under its mission statement by helping the community and having good ethics.

    Victor Valle

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks, Ryan, for your post. I appreciate how you set your post up by emphasizing the ethical tradition at DU and at DCB, for it does give you a foundation from which to critique what you see as the unethical business practices of Parking Services. I would agree with Vitor, though, too, that your opening discussion feels like it might take too long, for as I read it, I really expected the post to focus primarily on ethics; when you get to the parking issue it almost feels like a surprise. I think your critique of Parking Services' overselling spaces make sense, but I have few thoughts/questions to consider. First, I think all pass holders are told the same thing--that they're aren't guaranteed a spot in their lot. So even I, who pay for a pass for Lot E (the garage just west of Driscoll and north of the new residence hall), am not guaranteed a spot. Second, I wonder if there's any way to learn more about the parking services budget. That is, you suggest they're out to make a profit, but is that in fact borne out by the university budget? You may not be able to find that information, but some additiona extrinsic evidence might help you be more persuasive in these moments.

    ReplyDelete